On October 6th 2021, the Korean Academy of Medical Sciences published the journal of Korean Medical Science(e363) including a clinical research paper using AT-Patch.
"Comparison of Continuous ECG Monitoring by Wearable Patch Device and Conventional Telemonitoring Device"
Wonsuk Choi, Sun-Hwa Kim, Wonjae Lee, Si-Hyuck Kang, Chang-Hwan Yoon, Tae-Jin Youn and In-Ho Chae Cardiovascular Center, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea.
Researchers enrolled 10 patients who admitted to Seoul National University Bundang Hospital in Korea and required continuous ECG monitoring between October 31, 2019 and December 18, 2019. AT-Patch and conventional ECG monitoring device were simultaneously applied to the patients and maintained for 48 hours. From each patient, 48 pairs of ECG signal were collected and analyzed by two cardiologists independently. Discrepancy of diagnosis and frequency of noise or signal loss were compared between the two devices. From analyzable ECG data, discrepancy of arrhythmia diagnosis was not observed between the two devices. Noise rate was higher in conventional ECG monitoring device (2.5% vs. 17.3%, P < 0.001) and signal loss was not observed in AT-Patch while there was 9.4% of signal losses in conventional Holter recorder group. AT-Patch was well-tolerated among 48 hours of monitoring period and no adverse event was observed.
Exhibitor Data Sheet